Among those who were confused about Jackson’s intentions [in "The Lottery"] was Alfred L.
Kroeber, an anthropologist at the University of California, Berkeley.
“If Shirley Jackson’s intent was to symbolize into complete
mystification, and at the same time be gratuitously disagreeable, she
certainly succeeded,” he wrote. In an e-mail to me, Kroeber’s daughter,
the novelist Ursula Le Guin, who was nineteen years old when “The
Lottery” appeared, recalled her father’s reaction: “My memory is that my
father was indignant at Shirley Jackson’s story because as a social
anthropologist he felt that she didn’t, and couldn’t, tell us how the
lottery could come to be an accepted social institution.” Since Jackson
presented her fantasy “with all the trappings of contemporary realism,”
Le Guin said, her father felt that she was “pulling a fast one” on the
reader.
via