As a philosophical form, the fragment reflects the conditions of
modernity. In Friedrich Schlegel's view, the hyper-reflexive
expressive registers of irony and humor are particularly suited to
voice the modern mindset, and are, as such, intrinsically linked to the
fragment (such a view is also present in Novalis's writings,
though underemphasized in comparison with Friedrich Schlegel).
Novalis's turn to the fragment has a different philosophical
motivation. The fragment questions the idea that philosophical
system-building, be it of a deductive or a teleological kind, is fit to
capture the nature of reality. Like
Blüthenstaub—though the title was added when
Friedrich Schlegel was editing Novalis's text for
publication—the fragment emerges as an intellectual seed or
pollen that is meant to foster critical and independent reflection
rather than presenting a system of self-contained theorizing.
- via